Skip to main content

Arnold v. State

Citations

  • 847 S.E.2d 358
  • 309 Ga. 573

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that when there was evidentiary basis for inference made during closing argument, counsel’s failure to object did not give rise to ineffectiveness claim
  • explaining that trial counsel is not deficient for failing to make every conceivable objection but is “only deficient for failing to lodge those objections that every reasonable attorney would have lodged”
  • where there was evidentiary basis for inference made during closing argument, counsel’s failure to object did not give rise to ineffectiveness claim
  • “It is not improper for a 9 As in King v. State, “[w]e express no view . . . about whether an argument about future dangerousness would be undermined by recent legal developments.” 316 Ga. 611, 624 (5) (c) n.10 (889 SE2d 851) (2023

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.