Skip to main content

Head v. State

Citations

  • 575 S.E.2d 883
  • 276 Ga. 131
  • 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 288
  • 2003 Ga. LEXIS 75

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a juror with a leaning regarding the defendant’s guilt was nevertheless qualified because his opinion was not “fixed and definite”
  • similar transaction evidence is admissible to establish a peculiar course of conduct or bent of mind
  • “In making a closing argument, it is counsel’s right to . . . assail the credibility of witnesses by circumstances.”
  • “In making a closing argument, it is counsel’s right to . . . assail the credibility of witnesses by circumstances.”
  • “In making a closing argument, it is counsel’s right to impugn or condemn motives.”
  • “In making a closing argument, it is counsel’s right to impugn or condemn motives.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sears, Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.