Skip to main content

Armstrong v. State

Citations

  • 862 So. 2d 705
  • 2003 WL 22454933

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding a trial court committed no fundamental error when it denied a motion for change of venue where jurors explained they could set aside pretrial knowledge and feelings about victims
  • “Armstrong has failed to link a meritorious appellate issue to the allegedly - 75 - missing record and thus cannot establish that he was prejudiced by its absence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.