Alaska Wildlife Alliance v. Rue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that public employees and private contractors involved in wolf control program had legitimate expectation that state would not disclose their names because they had received credible threats of harm
• concluding that while public employees generally lack expectation of privacy in fact of employment, they do have legitimate expectation that their names will not be disclosed once credible threats are made against them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).