Mendel v. Felbert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• summarizing standards for relevancy in civil proceedings and requiring some “nexus between the information sought” and an issue in the case
• setting out procedure for in camera review when work-product privilege is claimed
• “ ‘[o]nce a litigant has presented prima facie evidence of the perpetration of a fraud or crime in the attorney-client relationship, the other party may not then claim the privilege’ ”
• impliedly allowing maintenance of claim for tortious custodial interference
• impliedly allowing maintenance of claim for tortious custodial interference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).