Skip to main content
· 11/8/1996

Cissna v. Stout

Citations

  • 931 P.2d 363
  • 1996 Alas. LEXIS 129
  • 1996 WL 650685

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • not filing new voter registration insufficient to defeat claim that residence has changed
  • affirming in election recount decided by one vote
  • affirming in election recount decided by one vote

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Compton, Rabinowitz, Eastaugh, Fabe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.