Geja's Cafe v. Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “ignoring the three- readings requirement has become a procedural regularity”
• explaining that, upon a good-faith uniformity challenge, the taxing authority must justify its classifications, whereupon the burden shifts to the plaintiff to demonstrate that the explanation is insufficient or unsupported by the facts
• noting that “ignoring the three-readings requirement has become a procedural regularity”
• “If a tax is constitutional under the uniformity clause, it inherently fulfills the requirements of the equal protection clause.”
• “We reaffirm the principle that these cases expound, namely that it is unconstitutional to impose unnecessary taxes”
• all provisions of challenged act pertained to the McCormick Place Expansion Project

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).