Skip to main content
· 2/11/1988

Estate of Johnson v. Condell Memorial Hospital

Citations

  • 520 N.E.2d 37
  • 119 Ill. 2d 496
  • 117 Ill. Dec. 47
  • 1988 Ill. LEXIS 20

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a duty is imposed where there is a special relationship and the attack was reasonably foreseeable
  • holding that a duty is imposed where there is a special relationship and the attack was reasonably foreseeable
  • holding that a duty is imposed where there is a special relationship and the attack was reasonably foreseeable
  • stating that, in general, one has no duty to control the conduct of another to prevent him from causing harm to a third party, absent a special relationship with either the person causing the harm or the injured party
  • stating that, in general, one has no duty to control the conduct of another to prevent him from causing harm to a third party, absent a special relationship with either the person causing the harm or the injured party
  • stating that, in general, one has no duty to control the conduct of another to prevent him from causing harm to a third party, absent a special relationship with either the person causing the harm or the injured party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ward

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.