· 2/11/1988
Estate of Johnson v. Condell Memorial Hospital
Citations
- 520 N.E.2d 37
- 119 Ill. 2d 496
- 117 Ill. Dec. 47
- 1988 Ill. LEXIS 20
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a duty is imposed where there is a special relationship and the attack was reasonably foreseeable
- holding that a duty is imposed where there is a special relationship and the attack was reasonably foreseeable
- holding that a duty is imposed where there is a special relationship and the attack was reasonably foreseeable
- stating that, in general, one has no duty to control the conduct of another to prevent him from causing harm to a third party, absent a special relationship with either the person causing the harm or the injured party
- stating that, in general, one has no duty to control the conduct of another to prevent him from causing harm to a third party, absent a special relationship with either the person causing the harm or the injured party
- stating that, in general, one has no duty to control the conduct of another to prevent him from causing harm to a third party, absent a special relationship with either the person causing the harm or the injured party
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ward
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.