Skip to main content
· 4/20/2006

In Re Estate of Funk

Citations

  • 849 N.E.2d 366
  • 221 Ill. 2d 30
  • 302 Ill. Dec. 574

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that this court’s supervisory authority “is bounded only by the exigencies which call for its exercise”
  • explaining that this court’s supervisory authority “is bounded only by the exigencies which call for its exercise”
  • noting that where the issues presented on appeal turn on the documentary evidence and on questions of law, appellate review is de novo
  • this court’s supervisory authority is “unlimited in extent and hampered by no specific rules or means for its exercise”
  • “A reviewing court may sustain the decision of a lower court on any grounds which are called for by the record ***.”
  • this court's supervisory authority is \unlimited in extent and hampered by no specific rules or means for its exercise\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Karmeier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.