Skip to main content

Apolinar v. State

Citations

  • 106 S.W.3d 407
  • 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 4370
  • 2003 WL 21197238

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that failure to request continuance waives complaint that State withheld exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland
  • concluding that admission of an extraneous offense was harmless because the jury had already heard evidence of appellant’s prior violent conduct
  • noting defendant generally is required to request a continuance to preserve error on Brady complaint
  • considering, when assessing harm following a trial court’s error, the fact that the jury assessed punishment below the maximum term statutorily permitted
  • reviewing error in admission of article 37.07, section 3(g) punishment phase extraneous offense evidence under rule 42.2(b)
  • reviewing error in admission of article 37.07, section 3(g) punishment phase extraneous offense evidence under rule 42.2(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tim Taft

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.