Home Pride Foods, Inc. v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that lost profits for theft of customer list could be measured by either plaintiffs losses or defendant’s gains, at plaintiffs option
• finding non-password protected information to qualify as trade secrets where the information had “independent economic value and was kept secret”
• noting plaintiff's claim for actual loss as includes lost profits; unjust enrichment includes research and development costs
• \We agree [with other cited jurisdictions] and hold that a customer list can be included in the definition of a trade secret ....\
• “We agree [with other cited jurisdictions] and hold that a customer list can be included in the definition of a trade secret . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).