Skip to main content
· 6/4/1990

Equifax Services, Inc., D/B/A Equifax Commercial Specialists F/k/a White & White Inspection and Audit Service, Inc. v. Steven A. Hitz

Citations

  • 905 F.2d 1355
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 8793
  • 1990 WL 72646

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the parties themselves have agreed ” to a choice of law provision
  • affirming district court's grant of preliminary injunction where district court found irreparable harm \based upon evidence suggesting that it is impossible to precisely calculate the amount of damage [the] plaintiff will suffer\ (alterations in original omitted)
  • former branch manager had sufficient minimum contacts with forum state by virtue of employment relationship with Kansas employer; action to enforce covenant not to compete
  • former branch manager had sufficient minimum contacts with forum state by virtue of employment relationship with Kansas employer; action to enforce covenant not to compete
  • where Kansas law was applied regarding covenant not to compete, court recognized in case of merger that surviving corporation automatically succeeds to rights of merged corporations to enforce employees’ covenants not to compete
  • \[W]hether money damages will constitute an adequate remedy requires consideration of the difficulty of proving damages with any reasonable degree of certainty.\ (citing RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF CONTRACTS § 360(a) & cmt. b (1981) )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Logan, Barrett, Ebel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.