Skip to main content
· 8/11/1967

Buford Linwood St. Clair v. State

Citations

  • 232 A.2d 565
  • 1 Md. App. 605
  • 1967 Md. App. LEXIS 417

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the appellant’s possession of stolen property justified the jury’s inference of fact that he was the thief and burglar

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Morton, Orth, MacGill, Jenieer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.