Dezarn v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “[t]he declarant’s spontaneity, a product of the emotions being experienced by the declarant, is the key factor in determining the admissibility of the statement,” and “the amount of elapsed time is not the sole factor to be considered”
• Testimony was admitted both as an excited utterance under Alaska Evidence Rule 803(2) and under the residual hearsay exception of Alaska Evidence Rule 804(b)(5
• Testimony was admitted both as an excited utterance under Alaska Evidence Rule 803(2) and under the residual hearsay exception of Alaska Evidence Rule 804(b)(5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).