Skip to main content

Anderson v. State

Citations

  • 322 S.W.3d 401
  • 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 7122
  • 2010 WL 3409656

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the fact-finder is the exclusive judge of the credibility of witnesses and of the weight to be given to their testimony
  • providing that theft is completed when all of the elements of theft are met
  • involving a defendant that continued to make misrepresentations after elements of a theft were completed, but providing that the misrepresentations did not create a new theft since the prior thefts, comprising aggregate theft, already were complete
  • requiring deference to the jury as the exclusive judge of the witnesses’ credibility and the weight to be given their testimony, and holding that reconciliation of conflicts in the evidence is exclusively reserved for the jury
  • “The fact- finder is the exclusive judge of the credibility of witnesses and of the weight to be given to their testimony”
  • fact-finder is the exclusive judge of credibility of witnesses and of weight to be given testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adele Hedges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.