David Samaripas Jr. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding evidence sufficient to support EOCA conviction where there was evidence that appellant acted in retaliation for rival gang’s shooting him in previous altercation
• noting courts may consider “any prior history of sanctionable conduct on the part of the offender” as one factor in assessing pleadings sanctions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).