S.D. New York· 3/1/2010
Amusement Industry, Inc. v. Stern
Citations
- 693 F. Supp. 2d 301
- 2010 WL 445900
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that even where a justicia-ble controversy exists, “a court must still decide whether it will exercise its discretion to entertain a request for declaratory judgment”
- permitting third- party plaintiff’s alternative allegations that (a) no agency relationship existed between it and third-party defendant, but (b) if relationship did exist, third-party plaintiff would be entitled to indemnification
- “Courts generally reject a DJA claim when other claims in the suit will resolve the same issues.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gorenstein, Kaplan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named Amusement Industry, Inc. v. Stern
7 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- AMUSEMENT INDUSTRY, INC. v. SternS.D. New York· 2011-03-11· cited 32×
- Amusement Industry, Inc. v. SternS.D. New York· 2010-03-01· cited 32×
- Amusement Industry, Inc. v. SternS.D. New York· 2013-02-11· cited 17×
- AMUSEMENT INDUSTRY, INC. v. SternS.D. New York· 2009-09-28· cited 8×
- Amusement Industry, Inc. v. SternS.D. New York· 2010-03-01· cited 5×
- AMUSEMENT INDUSTRY, INC. v. SternS.D. New York· 2011-03-11· cited 3×
- AMUSEMENT INDUSTRY, INC. v. SternS.D. New York· 2011-03-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.