Skip to main content
· 12/27/1995

NY Univ. v. CONT'L INS CO

Citations

  • 662 N.E.2d 763
  • 87 N.Y.2d 308
  • 639 N.Y.S.2d 283

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that requirement was not met because claim involved only a private contract dispute as to policy coverage
  • holding that allegations of breach of contract “and any covenants implied” do not sound in fraud
  • concluding that because the amended complaint failed to state a tort independent of the contract, the court had “no occasion to address the sufficiency of the complaint’s claim for punitive damages under the remaining prongs . . . .”
  • holding that a defendant may be liable in tort where it breaches a duty of reasonable care distinct from its contractual obligations, and where it engages in tortious conduct separate and apart from its failure to fulfill its contractual obligations
  • holding that to state a claim for punitive damages from a breach of contract, “the threshold task for a court considering defendant’s motion to dismiss a cause of action for punitive damages is to identify a tort independent of the contract”
  • holding that to state a claim for punitive damages from a breach of contract, “the threshold task for a court considering defendant’s motion to dismiss a cause of action for punitive damages is to identify a tort independent of the contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick Concur

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.