Let W. Lee v. Bankers Trust Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Act broadly and unambiguously provides for immunity from any law except the federal constitution for any statement in a suspicious activity report
• noting that the Palmisano test has been adopted by some district courts, but declining to sanction it
• “Legislative history and other tools of interpretation may be relied upon only if the terms of the statute are ambiguous.”
• “Legislative history ... may be relied upon only if the terms of the statute are ambiguous.”
• “Financial institutions are required by law to file SARs, but are prohibited from disclosing that either a SAR has been filed or the information contained therein.”
• “Legislative history and other tools of interpretation may be relied upon only if the terms of the statute are ambiguous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).