Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1/25/1994
Amore v. Frankel
Citations
- 228 Conn. 358
- 636 A.2d 786
- 1994 Conn. LEXIS 9
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that because count one of the complaint alleged facts that supported a cause of action under Connecticut's defective highway statute, the count \was sufficient to establish subject matter jurisdiction and to withstand the defendant's motion to dismiss.\ Id.
- upholding dismissal of action under § 13a-144 when plaintiff did not respond to commissioner's affidavits averring that department was not responsible for driveway at issue
- “in the absence of any disputed issues of fact pertaining to jurisdiction, there was no need to hold an evidentiary hearing before deciding the motion to dismiss”
- discussing commissioner’s duty under statute “to repair or maintain”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berdon, Katz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Peabody, N.E., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-08-20· cited 205×
- Antinerella v. RiouxSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-05-31· cited 149×
- Serrano v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-04-20· cited 149×
- Doe v. MarselleConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-07-04· cited 133×
- Ferreira v. PringleSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-02-13· cited 118×
- Novicki v. City of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-02-24· cited 71×
- Capers v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-11-26· cited 49×
- Florian v. LengeConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-09-13· cited 48×
- P & L Properties, Inc. v. Schnip Development Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1994-06-03· cited 36×
- Lemoine v. McCannConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-03-05· cited 36×
- Villager Pond, Inc. v. Town of DarienConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-07-13· cited 36×
- In Re Matthew F.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-08-03· cited 32×
- In Re Jose B.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-01-31· cited 30×
- Long v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court· 1997-12-05· cited 30×
- Pinchbeck v. Department of Public HealthConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-08-21· cited 29×
- Fennelly v. NortonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-08-07· cited 26×
- McIntosh v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-07-05· cited 25×
- Herzig v. HorriganConnecticut Appellate Court· 1994-06-03· cited 21×
- Martin v. BradyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-07-24· cited 21×
- Graham v. Comm'r of Transp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-11-20· cited 18×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-05-07· cited 1,138×
- Standard Tallow Corp. v. JowdySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-05-03· cited 447×
- Barde v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-04-12· cited 384×
- Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-06-11· cited 365×
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-01-02· cited 270×
- Duguay v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-23· cited 225×
- City of Bridgeport v. DebekSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-02-21· cited 141×
- Baskin's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-12-11· cited 131×
- Miko v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-08-20· cited 116×
- Lussier v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-01-25· cited 93×
- American Laundry MacHinery, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-05-24· cited 91×
- Shea v. First Federal Savings & Loan Assn. of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-05-26· cited 84×
- Tamm v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-06-02· cited 76×
- Steele v. Town of StoningtonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-03-23· cited 57×
- Merrimac Associates, Inc. v. DiSesaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-05-13· cited 53×
- Sprague Electric Co. v. Maine Unemployment Insurance CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1988-07-05· cited 35×
- Amore v. FrankelConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-11-24· cited 29×
- Cairns v. ShugrueSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-02-23· cited 16×
- Amore v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-02-11· cited 1×
Other cases named Amore v. Frankel
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.