Supreme Court of Connecticut· 12/11/1984
Baskin's Appeal from Probate
Citations
- 194 Conn. 635
- 484 A.2d 934
- 1984 Conn. LEXIS 725
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that \an appeal from probate is a de novo proceeding in which the Superior Court is not limited to the claims raised in the Probate Court\
- recognizing that ‘‘an appeal from probate is a de novo proceeding in which the Superior Court is not limited to the claims raised in the Probate Court’’
- where the court noted the applicability of both motions to dismiss and to strike in appeals from probate
- “[T]he existence of aggrievement depends upon ‘whether there is a possibility, as distinguished from a certainty, that some legally protected interest . . . has been adversely affected.’” (alteration in original) (emphasis added
- widow very upset when consented to original burial site
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shea
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-05-07· cited 1,138×
- Pratt v. Town of Old SaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-03-23· cited 166×
- Amore v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-01-25· cited 160×
- Connecticut State Medical Society v. Connecticut Board of Examiners in PodiatrySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-04-21· cited 143×
- Mahoney v. LensinkConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-11-29· cited 96×
- Kerin v. StangleSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-11-29· cited 76×
- State v. MorowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-07-15· cited 65×
- Montanaro Brothers Builders, Inc. v. SnowConnecticut Appellate Court· 1985-05-14· cited 51×
- Capers v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-11-26· cited 49×
- Erisoty's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-11-27· cited 38×
- Progressive Casualty Insurance v. DiGangiConnecticut Appellate Court· 1985-05-21· cited 37×
- Carl J. Herzog Foundation, Inc. v. University of BridgeportConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-06-25· cited 37×
- Egri v. FoisieConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-06-08· cited 36×
- Gardner v. BalboniSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-03-26· cited 35×
- Buchholz's Appeal from ProbateConnecticut Appellate Court· 1987-01-06· cited 34×
- Anderson v. SchiefferConnecticut Appellate Court· 1994-06-01· cited 32×
- Caltabiano v. PhillipsConnecticut Appellate Court· 1990-09-18· cited 27×
- State v. GordonConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-06-17· cited 21×
- Bishop v. BordonaroConnecticut Appellate Court· 1989-09-19· cited 19×
- Doyle v. ReardonConnecticut Appellate Court· 1987-06-16· cited 18×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Standard Tallow Corp. v. JowdySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-05-03· cited 447×
- O'LEARY v. McGuinnessSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1953-06-23· cited 81×
- Hartford Kosher Caterers, Inc. v. GazdaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-12-04· cited 77×
- Prince v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1969-06-17· cited 65×
- Merrimac Associates, Inc. v. DiSesaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-05-13· cited 53×
- Maloney v. TaplinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1966-11-23· cited 44×
- Lenge v. GoldfarbSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-07-22· cited 32×
- Perrys, Inc. v. Waterbury Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1968-10-29· cited 28×
- Thomas v. ArafehSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-03-21· cited 13×
- Toppin v. MoriartyNew Jersey Court of Chancery· 1899-10-23· cited 11×
- Theodore v. TheodoreNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1953-07-29· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.