Supreme Court of Connecticut· 6/2/1992
Tamm v. Burns
Citations
- 222 Conn. 280
- 610 A.2d 590
- 1992 Conn. LEXIS 175
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the plaintiff’s claim that state had taken the plaintiff’s property in the constitutional sense, but suggesting that the plaintiff’s allegations may “support a claim of nuisance or some other sort of tortious interference by the state”
- allegations were insufficient to support claim of uncon- stitutional taking by way of inverse condemnation
- ‘‘[t]o survive a motion to dismiss on the ground of sovereign immunity, a complaint must allege suffi- cient facts to support a finding of a taking of land in a constitutional sense’’ (internal quotation marks omit- ted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berdon, Shea
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Amore v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-01-25· cited 160×
- Kelley Property Development, Inc. v. Town of LebanonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-07-06· cited 125×
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-07-11· cited 110×
- Chotkowski v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-03-18· cited 103×
- Citino v. Redevelopment AgencyConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-12-15· cited 81×
- Novicki v. City of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-02-24· cited 71×
- Gold v. RowlandSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-05-11· cited 68×
- City of Bristol v. Tilcon Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-09-25· cited 56×
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. LawSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-12-18· cited 35×
- Amore v. FrankelConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-11-24· cited 29×
- First Union National Bank v. Hi Ho Mall Shopping Ventures, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-04-12· cited 25×
- 184 Windsor Avenue, LLC. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-07-05· cited 19×
- Wheelabrator Lisbon, Inc. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-08-28· cited 16×
- Albahary v. City and Town of Bristol, Conn.D. Connecticut· 1997-03-24· cited 13×
- Albahary v. City of BristolConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-08-03· cited 6×
- Ulichny v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-19· cited 5×
- Barnett v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.D. Connecticut· 2012-09-28· cited 5×
- A & F Construction Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-10-03· cited 4×
- Ertel v. RocqueConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-05-27· cited 3×
- Spillane v. LamontSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-07-30· cited 2×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 3,324×
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court· 1897-03-01· cited 1,229×
- Barron Ex Rel. Tiernan v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court· 1833-02-16· cited 561×
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-04-19· cited 383×
- Richards v. Washington Terminal Co.Supreme Court· 1914-05-04· cited 160×
- Doe v. HeintzSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-06-09· cited 133×
- Sentner v. Board of Trustees of Regional Community CollegesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-06-09· cited 93×
- Textron, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1974-12-03· cited 89×
- Dooley v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1964-01-21· cited 74×
- McNish v. American Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1952-06-03· cited 66×
- Benson v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1958-03-25· cited 50×
- Bradley's Appeal from ProbateConnecticut Appellate Court· 1989-08-29· cited 50×
- Vartelas v. Water Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1959-07-28· cited 47×
- D'ADDARIO v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-12-28· cited 46×
- DeMello v. Town of PlainvilleSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-04-20· cited 40×
- Andrews v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1942-12-28· cited 39×
- Laurel, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-07-22· cited 36×
- Horak v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-07-06· cited 35×
- Simmons v. ParizekSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1969-06-17· cited 26×
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. DarkeIllinois Supreme Court· 1893-11-29· cited 25×
Other cases named Tamm v. Burns
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.