Shea v. First Federal Savings & Loan Assn. of New Haven

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that federal regulations expressly permit federal savings and loan association to shift costs of legal services to borrowers
• as Congress contemplated uniform national lending procedures for federal associations, state legislation may not impinge upon Board’s power to regulate and supervise lending practices
• state anti-trust action against savings and loan not in conflict with federal law
• \[b]oth federal and Connecticut antitrust law attempt to promote competition in the marketplace\
• “[b]oth federal and Connecticut antitrust law attempt to promote competition in the marketplace”
• \The Superior Court has jurisdiction of all matters expressly committed to it and of all other judicially cognizable matters not within the exclusive jurisdiction of [a federal forum].\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).