Centech Group, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the “Limitation on Subcontracting” clause was material because the mix of prime-subcontractor labor affected cost evaluation
• holding that agencies may not informally alter the procurement requirements set in statutes and regulations
• holding that a proposal that did not offer to provide what the request for proposals requests was not responsive to the request for proposals
• holding that agency action is rational where the agency “provided a coherent and reasonable explanation of its exercise of discretion”
• holding that a proposal that did not offer to provide what the RFP requests was not responsive to the RFP
• holding that a proposal that did not offer to provide what the request for proposals requests was not responsive to the request for proposals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).