Federal Circuit· 2/3/2009
Centech Group, Inc. v. United States
Citations
- 554 F.3d 1029
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 1867
- 2009 WL 234790
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the “Limitation on Subcontracting” clause was material because the mix of prime-subcontractor labor affected cost evaluation
- holding that agencies may not informally alter the procurement requirements set in statutes and regulations
- holding that a proposal that did not offer to provide what the request for proposals requests was not responsive to the request for proposals
- holding that agency action is rational where the agency “provided a coherent and reasonable explanation of its exercise of discretion”
- holding that a proposal that did not offer to provide what the RFP requests was not responsive to the RFP
- holding that a proposal that did not offer to provide what the request for proposals requests was not responsive to the request for proposals
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rader, Schall, Prost
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
387 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Weeks Marine, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2009-08-10· cited 531×
- Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2012-08-24· cited 261×
- Orion Technology, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2013-01-14· cited 195×
- Linc Government Services, LLC v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2010-11-05· cited 159×
- Turner Const. Co., Inc. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2011-07-14· cited 152×
- Allied Technology Group, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2011-06-09· cited 140×
- Digitalis Education Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2012-01-04· cited 116×
- PlanetSpace Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2010-04-26· cited 102×
- Per Aarsleff A/S v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2016-06-23· cited 100×
- CBY Design Builders v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2012-05-23· cited 87×
- Blackwater Lodge & Training Center, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2009-04-17· cited 85×
- Contracting, Consulting, Engineering LLC v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2012-04-16· cited 78×
- Bcpeabody Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2013-09-25· cited 74×
- Vanguard Recovery Assistance v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2011-11-22· cited 74×
- Supreme Foodservice Gmbh v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2013-03-04· cited 68×
- Sierra Nevada Corp. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2012-11-01· cited 68×
- Crassociates, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2010-10-04· cited 61×
- Allied Technology Group, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2010-07-02· cited 57×
- Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2011-08-09· cited 53×
- PlanetSpace Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2010-12-14· cited 51×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2005-04-21· cited 1,137×
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2001-01-03· cited 1,118×
- Pgba, LLC v. United States, and Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance CorporationFederal Circuit· 2004-11-22· cited 533×
- Honeywell, Inc. v. The United States v. Haz-Tad, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1989-04-05· cited 433×
- Lyng v. PayneSupreme Court· 1986-08-19· cited 401×
- The United States v. Amdahl CorporationFederal Circuit· 1986-03-06· cited 131×
- CHE Consulting, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2008-12-30· cited 99×
- Planning Research Corporation v. The United States, and Electronic Data Systems Federal Corporation, IntervenorFederal Circuit· 1992-08-05· cited 54×
- Blount, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1990-12-20· cited 31×
- Chapman Law Firm v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2005-01-25· cited 28×
- Centech Group, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2007-12-07· cited 13×
Other cases named Centech Group, Inc. v. United States
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.