Skip to main content

State v. Taylor

Citations

  • 648 So. 2d 701
  • 1995 WL 2418

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing an officer was authorized to request the defendant to perform FSEs where the officer had reasonable suspicion that a DUI was being committed
  • finding reasonable suspicion for DUI where defendant was speeding; staggered upon exiting his car; and had slurred speech, watery, bloodshot eyes, and a strong odor of alcohol
  • Appellant’s “refusal [to take field sobriety tests] is relevant to show consciousness of guilt.”
  • refusal to perform field sobriety exercises admissible as a suspect’s consciousness of guilt and can factor into a finding of probable cause
  • “[Defendant’s] refusal [to submit to field sobriety test] is relevant to show consciousness of guilt. If he has an innocent explanation for not taking the tests, he is free to offer that explanation in court.”
  • field sobriety tests do not violate any Fourth Amendment rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.