R.I.L-R v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ICE's deterrence policy is a final agency action subject to APA review, despite the lack of a writing memorializing the policy
• concluding that claims that a class of asylum seekers had been unlawfully detained qualified as inherently transitory
• recognizing that the period of detention between ICE's initial screening of asylum seekers and a custody redetermination by an immigration judge is typically weeks or months
• holding that ICE’s deterrence policy is a final agency action subject to APA review, despite the lack of a writing memorializing the policy
• holding that \ample evidence that nearly every Central American family apprehended since June 2014 has been detained\ supports conclusion that \common questions of law and fact united the class members' claims\
• holding that district courts have jurisdiction to review challenges to policies underlying detention but not discretionary determinations granting or denying bond or parole in individual cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).