D.C. Circuit· 7/3/2018

Aracely v. Nielsen

Citations

319 F. Supp. 3d 110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

ruling that DHS’s unwritten “immigration deterrence” policy constituted “final agency action” for purposes of APA review
concluding that plaintiffs alleged a policy by pointing to both data showing significant decrease in parole release rate of asylum seekers and to specific “rejections of Plaintiffs’ parole requests—purportedly upon consideration of an improper factor”
concluding that due process does not entitle asylum-seekers to individual hearings
stating that \arriving aliens\ are \considered under the law to have never entered the United States\ even if they are physically present within United States borders
recognizing an Accardi claim related to a policy that “establishe[d] procedural rights for asylum seekers in connection with the parole process”
concluding upon review of the record that “Plaintiffs’ evidence of an unwritten . . . policy . . . outweigh[ed] Defendants’ self-serving declaration to the contrary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Contreras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

106 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.