Al-Attawy v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering that jury had other evidence from which it could assess credibility of victim and victim was subjected to cross-examination
• reviewing bolstering testimony in the context of all the evidence to determine whether it affected the outcome of the trial
• the impact of the bolstering testimony was diminished, where bolstering witness retreated from her credibility opinion
• “[W]e review the bolstering testimony within its context to determine whether it affected the trial’s outcome.”
• expert witness’s testimony that she found the victim’s “disclosure to be credible” was improper bolstering
• counsel directly attacked psychologist’s bolstering testimony and witness qualified her prior testimony on cross-examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).