Skip to main content
· 6/18/2008

Birkbeck v. State

Citations

  • 665 S.E.2d 354
  • 292 Ga. App. 424
  • 2008 Ga. App. LEXIS 703

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering whether items were likely to be affected by passage of time in determining whether information in warrant affidavit was stale
  • considering whether items were likely to be affected by passage of time in determining whether information in warrant affidavit was stale
  • warrant seeking videos of child pornography related to crime that occurred two years previously was not stale
  • warrant seeking videos of child pornography related to crime that occurred two years previously was not stale
  • failure to object to a single comment on the ultimate issue did not result in sufficient prejudice for reversal in light of isolated nature of comment, jury’s ability to evaluate the witnesses, and the other evidence of guilt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Barnes, Phipps

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.