Skip to main content

Odom v. State

Citations

  • 531 S.E.2d 207
  • 243 Ga. App. 227
  • 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 1506
  • 2000 Ga. App. LEXIS 345

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding “absolutely nothing wrong with expert opinion testimony that. . . ‘the victim’s psychological evaluation was consistent with sexual abuse’ ”
  • witness testimony that a victim’s behavior was consistent with allegations of sexual abuse does not constitute impermissible bolstering
  • expert opinion testimony that directly addresses the child’s credibility is inadmissible, but the fact that such testimony indirectly though necessarily involves the child’s credibility does not render it inadmissible
  • “[T]here is absolutely nothing wrong with expert opinion testimony that bolsters the credibility of the indicted allegations of sexual abuse, e.g.,... the victim’s psychological evaluation was consistent with sexual abuse.”
  • “[T]here is absolutely nothing wrong with expert opinion testimony that bolster’s the credibility of the indicted allegations of sexual abuse, e.g., . . . the victim’s psychological evaluation was consistent with sexual abuse.”
  • witnesses may testify about behavior consistent with allegations of sexual abuse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eldridge, Blackburn, Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.