Branesky v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• context of challenged testimony is important to harm analysis, whether contested remark commented directly on allegations is relevant
• evidence that defendant made 23 child touch his penis was sufficient to sustain conviction for child molestation
• venue established when “child testified that the crime took place at a certain location, and the deputy testified that the location identified by the child is in Meriwether County”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).