ADEMAKINWA v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing and remanding for calculation of benefits where “additional proceedings would simply delay the ‘inevitable receipt of benefits’” (quoting Hawkins v. Massanari, No. 00-cv-2102, 2002 WL 379898, at (D.D.C. Mar. 8, 2002)
• “[R]emand is appropriate . . . where the court cannot determine the ALJ’s rationale . . . without further findings or clearer explanation for the decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).