Kenner v. Berryhill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• SSA “failed to respond to two of the arguments addressed in detail by Plaintiff,” and thus, “this court has no alternative other than to find that Defendant has conceded Plaintiff’s arguments”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Williams v. Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority
  District of Columbia· 2022-03-31
• Ruppert v. Saul
  District of Columbia· 2022-04-11
• Harvey v. Berryhill
  District of Columbia· 2022-07-06
• Brown v. Kijakazi
  District of Columbia· 2024-03-12

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Richardson v. Perales
  Supreme Court· 1971-05-03· cited 22,864×
• Butler, Joan S. v. Barnhart, Jo Anne B.
  D.C. Circuit· 2004-01-13· cited 238×
• Lorraine Smith v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, Department of Health & Human Services
  D.C. Circuit· 1987-08-25· cited 111×
• Rossello Ex Rel. Rossello v. Astrue
  D.C. Circuit· 2008-06-24· cited 102×
• Jones v. Astrue
  D.C. Circuit· 2011-08-05· cited 64×
• Espinosa v. Astrue
  District of Columbia· 2013-07-02· cited 36×
• Settles v. Colvin
  District of Columbia· 2015-08-17· cited 36×
• Ward v. Berryhill
  District of Columbia· 2017-03-31· cited 28×
• Contreras v. Commissioner of Social Security
  District of Columbia· 2017-03-09· cited 26×
• ADEMAKINWA v. Astrue
  District of Columbia· 2010-03-19· cited 24×
• Davis v. Transportation Security Administration
  District of Columbia· 2017-08-28· cited 19×
• Holland v. Berryhill
  District of Columbia· 2017-08-29· cited 11×
• Faison v. Colvin
  District of Columbia· 2016-05-20· cited 8×
• Brown v. Colvin
  District of Columbia· 2016-11-30· cited 5×