Rossello Ex Rel. Rossello v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing decision of the appeals council where it “cited no evidence to undermine the only conclusion that the record permits”
• reversing decision of the appeals counsel where it “cited no evidence to undermine the only conclusion that the record permits”
• “Substantial-evidence review is highly deferential to the agency fact-finder, requiring only ‘such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.’ ”
• “Substantial-evidence review is highly deferential to the agency fact-finder, requiring only ‘such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.’”
• reversal of the Commissioner’s decision indicated where the decision “does not pass muster.”
• “Substantial- evidence review is highly deferential to the agency fact-finder, requiring only ‘such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).