Acosta v. Artuz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because unpreserved error “was presented in a context where it would not ordinarily have been considered, petitioner’s claim, to the extent that it is based thereon, fails the ‘fair presentation’ tests articulated in Castille and Bell”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).