Second Circuit· 1/3/2001

James Williams v. Christopher Artuz

Citations

237 F.3d 147
2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 34

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a petitioner’s judgment of conviction becomes final ninety days from the date the New York Court of Appeals denies leave to appeal
finding that the limitations period “begins to run only after the denial of certiorari or the expiration of time for seeking certiorari”
recognizing Waller as “clearly established” law applicable to habeas review of courtroom closures
the limitations period “begins to run only after the denial of certiorari or the expiration of time for seeking certiorari”
limitations period commenced at completion of certiorari process or conclusion of ninety-day period during which petitioner cold have filed certiorari petition
“‘[D]irect review,’ as used in [28 U.S.C. §] 2244(d)(1)(A), includes direct review by the United States Supreme Court via writ of certiorari . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Winter, Sack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.