Raymond W. Snider v. Dr. Melindez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “failure] to state a claim as used in Section[ ] 1997e(c) ... of the PLRA does not include failure to exhaust administrative remedies” (first alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding that § 1915(g) does not apply to suits dismissed ʺfor failure to comply with a procedural prerequisiteʺ
• noting that §1915(g) serves only to narrow “the circumstances under which prisoners may file in forma pauperis . . . in the federal courts”
• noting that the Supreme Court has “long held that courts may dismiss actions on their own motion in a broad range of circumstances”
• noting that the Supreme Court has “long held that courts may dismiss actions on their own motion in a broad range of circumstances”
• explaining that failure to give proper notice “may tend to produce the very effect the court seeks to avoid—a waste of judicial resources—by leading to appeals and remands” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).