Skip to main content
· 10/17/2005

Abdur'Rahman v. Bredesen

Citations

  • 181 S.W.3d 292
  • 2005 Tenn. LEXIS 828
  • 2005 WL 2615801

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the department of correction may be tasked with determining protocol without violating substantive or procedural due process
  • holding that the department of correction may be tasked with determining protocol without violating substantive or procedural due process
  • holding that the Court is restrained from adopting an interpretation of any statute that would lead to absurd results
  • holding that the department of correction may be tasked with determining protocol without violating substantive or procedural due process
  • holding that the management of executions is ill suited to APA rulemaking
  • noting that lethal injection is \commonly thought to be the most humane form of execution\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justice E. Riley Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.