Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Court of Appeals of Arizona· 10/8/2009

A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control District

Citations

  • 217 P.3d 1220
  • 222 Ariz. 515
  • 566 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
  • 2009 Ariz. App. LEXIS 734

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that defendant has the burden to prove a non-party is at fault
  • approving a jury instruction on the available measure of damages that “reflected the true economic loss” of the injured landowners and rejecting an alternate theory that would result in a windfall at the defendants’ expense
  • appellate court “will uphold a general verdict if evidence on any one count, issue, or theory is sufficient to sustain the verdict”
  • it is not the responsibility of this court to search the record for authorities that support parties' arguments
  • Arizona law requires government to pay just compensation when it takes or damages private property
  • \An offer of proof is 'simply a detailed description of what the proposed evidence is.' \ (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Barker, Downie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control District

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.