Piner v. Superior Court in and for County of Maricopa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• illustrating that allocation of fault under A.R.S. § 12-2506 must total one hundred percent
• accepting special action jurisdiction when facts uncontested and legal issue could “properly be decided on the present record”
• discussing the indivisible injury rule in Arizona after the legislature adopted the Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act
• granting review to address significant legal issue despite court of appeals having declined special action jurisdiction
• accepting special action jurisdiction when facts uncontested and legal issue could “properly be decided on the present record”
• accepting special action jurisdiction when facts uncontested and legal issue could “properly be decided on the present record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).