Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. Petta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party had standing for a pre-petition claim of medical battery when the bankruptcy court denied the bankruptcy trustee’s attempt to sell the claim
• finding that the damage award was not supported where it could not be reconciled with other Arizona civil jury verdicts
• noting that the denial of a motion for summary judgment is not reviewable on appeal from a final judgment entered after trial on the merits
• concluding the plaintiff’s testimony and conclusory statements regarding damages, “unsupported by any documentary evidence,” were speculative
• concluding notice of appeal conferred jurisdiction when the non- specified orders \were all part of the same determination on the same claims\
• concluding notice of appeal conferred jurisdiction when the non-specified orders “were all part of the same determination on the same claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).