Ryan v. San Francisco Peaks Trucking Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an improper cross-examination of a witness under Rule 602 was harmless because the witness was cross-examined with documents already admitted as exhibits
• expert testimony is required to establish medical negligence unless it is readily apparent to a layman
• medical malpractice plaintiff must prove negligence by showing health care provider fell below standard of care and such deviation from standard of care proximately caused claimed injury
• unless it is readily apparent to the trier of fact, expert medical testimony is required to establish that defendant’s conduct fell below the standard of care and that defendant’s conduct proximately caused plaintiff’s injury
• disclosure statements alone do not satisfy a plaintiff’s burden of proving negligence
• expert testimony required in 24 medical malpractice cases under A.R.S. § 12-563

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).