Mills v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• favorable practice of state is irrelevant to assessing compliance with Chapter 154

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. Anderson
  S.D. Ohio· 2000-02-22· cited 36×
• Henderson v. Collins
  S.D. Ohio· 1999-08-04· cited 14×
• Ashmus v. Calderon
  N.D. California· 1998-12-24· cited 8×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McFarland v. Scott
  Supreme Court· 1994-06-30· cited 1,282×
• Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, Warden
  Seventh Circuit· 1996-09-12· cited 550×
• State v. Crowder
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1991-06-12· cited 121×
• Lindh v. Murphy
  Supreme Court· 1997-01-10· cited 90×
• Zuern v. Tate
  S.D. Ohio· 1996-08-07· cited 13×
• Hamblin v. Anderson
  N.D. Ohio· 1996-11-06· cited 9×

Other cases named Mills v. Anderson

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Mills v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1917-09-13· cited 3×
• Mills v. Anderson
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-12-12