S.D. Ohio· 8/4/1999
Henderson v. Collins
Citations
- 101 F. Supp. 2d 866
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21947
- 1999 WL 1953224
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “neither the Murnahan decision nor Ohio App. R. 14(B) set an outer limit or absolute deadline that would have alerted Petitioner to a certain deadline for filing a Murnahan Application pursuant to the rule [announced in Murnahan ].”
- concluding that \neither the Murnahan decision nor Ohio App. R. 14(B) set an outer limit or absolute deadline that would have alerted Petitioner to a certain deadline for filing a Murnahan Application pursuant to the rule [announced in Murnahan ].\
- concluding that “neither the Murnahan decision nor Ohio App. R. 14(B) set an outer limit or absolute deadline that would have alerted Petitioner to a certain deadline for filing a Murnahan Application pursuant to the rule [announced in Murnahan].”
- denying the ineffectiveness claim because Henderson had failed to establish prejudice, i.e., that the underlying claims had merit
- defendant who was represented by counsel and also sought to submit pro se brief upon appeal did not have right to such hybrid representation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spiegel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- George T. Franklin, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Carl S. Anderson, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 2006-01-09· cited 101×
- Jerome Henderson, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Terry L. Collins, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 2001-08-28· cited 35×
- Davie v. MitchellN.D. Ohio· 2003-09-04· cited 33×
- Franklin v. AndersonSixth Circuit· 2006-01-09
Cites
112 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 12,560×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1973-05-07· cited 9,100×
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court· 1983-07-05· cited 7,925×
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 7,499×
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 6,497×
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court· 1977-06-23· cited 6,068×
- United States v. FradySupreme Court· 1982-05-24· cited 5,791×
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 5,026×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-05-12· cited 4,572×
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 4,248×
- Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1986-09-03· cited 4,161×
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 3,997×
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court· 1961-06-05· cited 3,697×
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1985-02-26· cited 3,332×
- Harris v. ReedSupreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 3,033×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.