Supreme Court of Connecticut· 12/28/1982
Zoning Commission v. Lescynski
Citations
- 188 Conn. 724
- 453 A.2d 1144
- 1982 Conn. LEXIS 632
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- municipal estoppel applied with great caution, only when resulting violation has been unjustifiably induced by agent having authority in such matters and when special circumstances make it highly inequitable or oppressive to enforce the regulations
- essential elements of any estoppel claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peters, Healey, Parskey, Shea, Sponzo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Connecticut National Bank v. VoogSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-05-30· cited 179×
- Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. DubnoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-06-16· cited 159×
- Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-16· cited 112×
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-07-11· cited 110×
- Gelinas v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-05-25· cited 87×
- Carofano v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-07-09· cited 63×
- Town of West Hartford v. RechelSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-05-10· cited 62×
- Zotta v. BurnsConnecticut Appellate Court· 1986-07-15· cited 62×
- O'Sullivan v. BergentySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-04-24· cited 56×
- Dornfried v. October Twenty-Four, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-09· cited 53×
- Eis v. MeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-11-21· cited 48×
- Brown v. Employer's Reinsurance Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-03-29· cited 45×
- Wood v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-12-04· cited 43×
- Boyce v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-03-19· cited 42×
- Town of Greenwich v. KristoffConnecticut Appellate Court· 1984-09-11· cited 37×
- Soo Line Railroad Ex Rel. Minnesota v. B.J. Carney & Co.D. Minnesota· 1992-06-23· cited 35×
- Soares v. Max Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-07-16· cited 31×
- Barasso v. Rear Still Hill Road, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-03-09· cited 30×
- Maryland Reclamation Associates, Inc. v. Harford CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-03-11· cited 29×
- Harper v. Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-03-18· cited 18×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bianco v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1969-02-19· cited 147×
- Bozzi v. BozziSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-04-03· cited 133×
- City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.Supreme Court· 1978-04-24· cited 125×
- Dupuis v. Submarine Base Credit Union, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-03-16· cited 96×
- Pet Car Products, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1962-10-02· cited 63×
- Carini v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1972-12-07· cited 46×
- Hebb v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1963-05-15· cited 39×
- State v. Stonybrook, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1962-05-08· cited 32×
- District of Columbia v. CahillD.C. Circuit· 1931-11-30· cited 24×
- City of Evanston v. RobbinsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1969-12-05· cited 14×
- Tankersley Bros. Industries, Inc. v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1956-12-17· cited 10×
- Gillotti v. Food Fair Stores of Conn., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1961-05-23· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.