Supreme Court of Connecticut· 3/19/1996
Boyce v. Allstate Insurance
Citations
- 236 Conn. 375
- 673 A.2d 77
- 1996 Conn. LEXIS 57
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- analyzing equitable estoppel as bar to defendant insurance company’s invocation of insurance contract provision
- denying equitable estoppel because plaintiffs failed to present evidence of misleading conduct by the defendant on which they could have reasonably relied, and noting that “equitable estoppel requires misleading conduct by one party resulting in prejudice to other”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Callahan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-06-07· cited 98×
- Celentano v. Oaks Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-09-02· cited 68×
- Wasko v. ManellaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-06-08· cited 46×
- Union Carbide Corp. v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-09-04· cited 23×
- AFSCME, Council 4, Local 704 v. Department of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-02-01· cited 21×
- Culver v. CulverConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-03-15· cited 16×
- Mellon v. Century Cable Management Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-03-02· cited 13×
- Voris v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-07-27· cited 11×
- Parasco v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1998-05-19· cited 11×
- Kunst v. VitaleConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-08-13· cited 10×
- Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance v. SakonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-12-06· cited 9×
- Romprey v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-06-21· cited 4×
- Vasily v. Mony Life Insurance Co. of AmericaD. Connecticut· 2015-05-08· cited 4×
- Mendoza-Molostvov v. Vigilant InsuranceD. Connecticut· 2005-02-14
- Ralston v. Phoenix InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court· 1999-04-29
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-05-07· cited 1,138×
- Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-12-22· cited 283×
- Mather v. Griffin HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-04-19· cited 206×
- Novella v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1972-07-27· cited 158×
- Bozzi v. BozziSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-04-03· cited 133×
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-07-11· cited 110×
- Fleming v. GarnettSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-23· cited 109×
- Childs v. BainerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-15· cited 106×
- Zoning Commission v. LescynskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-12-28· cited 100×
- Dupuis v. Submarine Base Credit Union, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-03-16· cited 96×
- Hanover Insurance v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-02-05· cited 91×
- Emerick v. EmerickConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-09-01· cited 77×
- Pet Car Products, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1962-10-02· cited 63×
- Moore v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceOregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-29· cited 49×
- Spear-Newman, Inc. v. Modern Floors CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1961-11-21· cited 49×
- Campbell v. GouldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-07-24· cited 43×
- John T. Brady & Co. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-11-19· cited 38×
- Lunn v. Tokeneke Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-31· cited 29×
- Lebowitz v. McPikeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1968-12-10· cited 20×
- Meadows v. EMPLOYERS'FIRE INS. CO.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1982-12-15· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.