Skip to main content
· 10/2/1962

Pet Car Products, Inc. v. Barnett

Citations

  • 150 Conn. 42
  • 184 A.2d 797
  • 1962 Conn. LEXIS 251

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • for urban renewal, “[t]he plaintiff misconceives the agency’s responsibility to consider the condition obtaining in the entire area rather than the condition of the individual property”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aloobit, Baldwin, King, Murphy, Shea, Alcorn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.