Skip to main content
· 12/7/1972

Carini v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Citations

  • 164 Conn. 169
  • 319 A.2d 390
  • 1972 Conn. LEXIS 666

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • zoning board’s function is not to consider matters such as estoppel or laches in determining whether a variance should be granted
  • zoning board of appeals does not consider matters such as estoppel or laches in determining whether to grant variance
  • ‘‘[t]he board’s power is restricted to that provided by the zoning ordi- nance in accordance with legislative or statutory enact- ments’’
  • “failure to comply with zoning ordinances cannot be justified by the existence of other violations unless it is shown that a pattern of discrimination has been consciously practiced by the municipality” [emphasis added]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: House, Shapiro, Loiselle, MacDonald, Bogdanski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.