Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Tenth Circuit· 5/12/1998

Zinn v. McKune

Citations

  • 143 F.3d 1353
  • 1998 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2251
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 9486
  • 73 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,318
  • 78 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 435
  • 1998 WL 236329

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding no employer-employee relationship existed where plaintiff provided professional nursing services and defendant did not exercise control over her daily activities
  • affirming summary judgment on claim of whistleblower retaliatory discharge under Kansas law because, among other reasons, defendant was not plaintiff’s employer
  • affirming rejection of plaintiff’s whistleblower retaliation claim because defendant was not plaintiff’s employer under state law
  • the definition of employee “should be fleshed out by applying common-law agency principles to the facts and circumstances surrounding the working relationship of the parties” (Title VII case)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Barrett, Briscoe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Zinn v. McKune

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.