E.D. Virginia· 12/2/1992

Magnuson v. Peak Technical Services, Inc.

Citations

808 F. Supp. 500
1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18888
60 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 650
1992 WL 359570

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that false statements are sufficient to present improper methods for a tortious interference claim
finding that in joint employment under Title VII, the greatest emphasis should be placed on the “extent of the employer’s right to control the manner and means of the worker’s performance”
finding that in joint employment under Title VII, the greatest emphasis should be placed on the “extent of the employer’s right to control the manner and means of the worker’s performance”
“[T]he broad, remedial purpose of Title VII . . . militates against the adoption of a rigid rule strictly limiting ‘employer’ status under Title VII to an individual’s direct or single employer.”
“In order to be subject to liability under Title VII, a defendant must (1) fall within Title VU’s statutory definition of “employer,” and (2) have exercised substantial control over significant aspects of the compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of plaintiff’s employment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.